Reservation at the cost of Hindu tax payers is criminal looting-Dr Pravin Togadia
VHP general secretary Dr Pravin Togadia criticised the West Bengal Government for announcing 10 per cent reservation for Muslims in the state despite the fact that the Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed the state Government’s unconstitutional move to grant 4 per cent quota to Muslims in education, jobs and so on. "For an eye-wash the West Bengal government has shown that these reservations would be for socially, educationally and economically backward Muslims and OBCs in Muslims. This is all twisting the Constitution and exploiting the hard-working Hindus. Majority Hindus from middle class, higher middle class and other working/business class work hard and pay taxes. Instead of giving benefit of this money to poor Hindus-Scheduled Castes, OBCs and Vanvasis, the government is all out to use this money to subsidise Muslims who do not even limit number of children quoting religion. This is not only unfair to Hindus but also is a criminal looting of Hindus," Dr Togadia said in a statement issued in New Delhi on February 8.
He termed the Sachar and Rangnath Misra reports as "preparation for criminal looting of Hindus. "Andhra’s 4 per cent quota, Sachar and Rangnath reports and now West Bengal giving 10 per cent reservation to Muslims are not sporadic isolated incidents. They are well connected and are part of a larger conspiracy against Hindus. This criminal conspiracy of looting Hindus is being hatched to please and appease Muslim vote bank. Today Union government also announced that youth from PoK would be encouraged to come to J&K and would be given special facilities. At this moment 78 per cent Hindu youth in Bharat are unemployed, 79 per cent Hindu farmers have already lost their lands/crops and most are about to commit suicides, 68 per cent Hindu children are malnourished. Yet, instead of helping them, governments are showering favours on Muslims. This is not acceptable to Hindus," he said.
Dr Togadia said the Hindus are being exploited in every field like education, employment, bank loans, trade facilities, housing and so on. "From Inheritance Act to Marriage Act, all laws are only to trouble Hindus. Essential food costs have gone so high that even well-to-do middle class families are no more able to feed their children even a cup of milk daily and now there is Muslim reservation burden on the Hindus. Hindus have reached their limit of patience and without waiting for anyone to lead; Hindus would hit the streets any moment against this continued injustice. Muslims claim that they are no more just a simple minority; but they are ‘the second largest majority in India (as Jamait-e-ulema-e-Hind’s Maulana Madani says) and yet governments are bent on giving them facilities and reservations snatching education, employment, loans and lives of Hindus," the statement said.
He termed the move unconstitutional and expressed concern that this would encourage not just conversions but also jehadi incidents. He said, "Those who argue that Muslims are poor in Bharat and therefore they turn to jehad, are living in a fool’s paradise. Pilots, engineers, professionals from well-to-do families are following jehad as a lifestyle based on madarsa preaching. If they are poor they do jehad by bomb and when they get rich or educated they use planes, computers against Bharat. Therefore, it will help governments to get all Hindus to avail of education, employment, trade facilities instead of wasting Hindu taxpayer’s money on inspiring jehad. When majority develops, the nation automatically develops. Those who do not even follow Bharat’s Constitution should not be given an opportunity to misuse Bharat’s democracy and Constitution for increasing their population to ‘minoratise’ Hindus."
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Murder of Hindu fishermen
Marad terrorists convicted
By S Chandrasekhar
Despite continuous court judgments and judicial interventions against the spreading Jehadi menace, both the CPM and the Congress are pampering the likes of Madhani, NDF etc. for the fish and loaves of vote banks.
THE ‘Marad Massacre’ of eight Hindu fishermen in Marad beach in Kozhikode, on May 2, 2003 in still fresh in the mind of Hindus in Kerala. This was part of a Jehadi strategy to kill Kerala’s Hindu fishermen (Arayas). The role of Mayin Haji, confidant of Muslim League Minister P.K. Kunjalikutty was behind the massacre. Also Hilal Mohammed, who financed the operation is among loyalties to both the CPM and the Congress-League.
But, this united the Hindus of Kerala, like rock. Massive protests were organised for CBI probe and the Muslim families of Marad had to abandon their homes for almost a year. The RSS demand for Rs 10 lakh compensation for dead and job for dependent was agreed by then CM and now Defence Minister A.K. Antony.
The Thomas P. Joseph Judicial commission indicted Mayin Haji and Hilal Mohammed and called for CBI probe into the role of L-E-T and ISI in the carnage.
But the CPM and the Congress conspired to torpedo CBI probe, as it will expose their Jehadi nexus.
A few months back, the Marad Special Courts Judge gave life term totalling 27 Years to 62 Jehadis for the May 2 massacre. He also sentenced the manager of the marad mosque to five years for hiding the blood- stained weapons in the mosque. He also fined Rs. 10,000 on each convicted, the amount to be given to the dependents of the butchered. Incidentally the present Minister E. Ahmed ordered opening of the sealed ‘Marad Mosque’ and offered Namaz as a defiance to the Hindus.
Prior to the 2 May massacre five Hindus were killed by Jehadis at Marad during January 3 and 4, 2002.
The special Court in a judgement dated February 6, 2010, convicted seven Jehadis Latheef, Rizan, Manaf, Thajudeen, Manaf, Shafi and Anafi to Life imprisonment. They had killed among others Shimjith (16) after setting his house on fire. He had 70 cuts in his body!
The court also sentenced nine others to five years rigorous imprisonment. The court has also imposed a total fine of Rs.10 lakhs which is to be given to the dependents of dead at the rate of Rs. Two lakhs
Despite continuous court judgments and judicial interventions against the spreading Jehadi menace, both the CPM and the Congress are pampering the likes of Madhani, NDF etc. for the fish and loaves of vote banks. Kerala has become the terror factory of the whole world with kerala jehadis available all over.
By S Chandrasekhar
Despite continuous court judgments and judicial interventions against the spreading Jehadi menace, both the CPM and the Congress are pampering the likes of Madhani, NDF etc. for the fish and loaves of vote banks.
THE ‘Marad Massacre’ of eight Hindu fishermen in Marad beach in Kozhikode, on May 2, 2003 in still fresh in the mind of Hindus in Kerala. This was part of a Jehadi strategy to kill Kerala’s Hindu fishermen (Arayas). The role of Mayin Haji, confidant of Muslim League Minister P.K. Kunjalikutty was behind the massacre. Also Hilal Mohammed, who financed the operation is among loyalties to both the CPM and the Congress-League.
But, this united the Hindus of Kerala, like rock. Massive protests were organised for CBI probe and the Muslim families of Marad had to abandon their homes for almost a year. The RSS demand for Rs 10 lakh compensation for dead and job for dependent was agreed by then CM and now Defence Minister A.K. Antony.
The Thomas P. Joseph Judicial commission indicted Mayin Haji and Hilal Mohammed and called for CBI probe into the role of L-E-T and ISI in the carnage.
But the CPM and the Congress conspired to torpedo CBI probe, as it will expose their Jehadi nexus.
A few months back, the Marad Special Courts Judge gave life term totalling 27 Years to 62 Jehadis for the May 2 massacre. He also sentenced the manager of the marad mosque to five years for hiding the blood- stained weapons in the mosque. He also fined Rs. 10,000 on each convicted, the amount to be given to the dependents of the butchered. Incidentally the present Minister E. Ahmed ordered opening of the sealed ‘Marad Mosque’ and offered Namaz as a defiance to the Hindus.
Prior to the 2 May massacre five Hindus were killed by Jehadis at Marad during January 3 and 4, 2002.
The special Court in a judgement dated February 6, 2010, convicted seven Jehadis Latheef, Rizan, Manaf, Thajudeen, Manaf, Shafi and Anafi to Life imprisonment. They had killed among others Shimjith (16) after setting his house on fire. He had 70 cuts in his body!
The court also sentenced nine others to five years rigorous imprisonment. The court has also imposed a total fine of Rs.10 lakhs which is to be given to the dependents of dead at the rate of Rs. Two lakhs
Despite continuous court judgments and judicial interventions against the spreading Jehadi menace, both the CPM and the Congress are pampering the likes of Madhani, NDF etc. for the fish and loaves of vote banks. Kerala has become the terror factory of the whole world with kerala jehadis available all over.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
a satire
Pakistan's common man is innocent.
Pakistan's common man is not in Pakistani militarty. Pakistani military is consisting of Dutch, Africans and Japanese people.
Pakistan's common man do not give votes to India hating politicians. All the voters in Pakistani voter list are from Moskow and Timbaktu and France.
Believe me, I am telling honestly that common pakistani is innocent and wants peace with India.
But you Indians are making so much of noises while dieing just to disturb the peace talks.
Indians are really very cruel people.
Pakistan's common man is not in Pakistani militarty. Pakistani military is consisting of Dutch, Africans and Japanese people.
Pakistan's common man do not give votes to India hating politicians. All the voters in Pakistani voter list are from Moskow and Timbaktu and France.
Believe me, I am telling honestly that common pakistani is innocent and wants peace with India.
But you Indians are making so much of noises while dieing just to disturb the peace talks.
Indians are really very cruel people.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
"misquote as politicians’'
Quote, misquote as politicians’ last resort
What our editors should know is that some reporters do not attend meetings but get their information from someone who did; such reporters should be sharply pulled up. They are not doing their job, for which they are paid.
TWO issues stand out in the matter of the Shashi Tharoor case which need to be addressed. One is of being misquoted by the media. That is a serious enough charge, and needs to be immediately looked into. How can one possibly misquote a speaker if one is an attentive listener? In his presidential summing-up Tharoor was quoting Lord Bhiku Parekh who, apparently, was critical of both Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. The media ignored what Lord Bhiku Parekh said, which is bad enough. Then Shashi Tharoor was charged with criticising the Mahatma and Nehru when he was merely quoting Lord Parekh. That is worse. What our editors should know is that some reporters do not attend meetings but get their information from someone who did; such reporters should be sharply pulled up. They are not doing their job, for which they are paid. That is only one aspect of the problem.
A more serious one is the right of a politician to criticise his predecessors in the party. Mahatma Gandhi does not need anyone to defend him. In his time he was the unquestioned leader not just of the Congress, but of the country at large. In that sense, so was Nehru. Both made certain grievous mistakes. Nehru, for instance, should not have taken the Kashmir issue to the UN Security Council. In retrospect many have questioned Gandhi’s demand that the British should Quit India in 1942.
Happily, the media has risen to the occasion. The DNA (January 12) conceded that the media has erred in its reportage. But then it also pointed out: “The Congress Party is so steeped in its culture of worship, especially of the Nehru legacy, and to a lesser extent of Mahatma Gandhi, that it cannot countenance any criticism of its greats.” The paper pointed out that even when both Gandhi and Nehru were alive they had come in for regular criticism in the public domain, and even from within the party itself. Said DNA: “The (Congress) Party could just as well take a mature stance on what its members say about historical figures. It might help most Indian political parties if they encourage a little internal debate and discussion in the merits of democracy rather than take immediate umbrage. Party discipline need not be taken to Stalinists heights or depths as the case may be.” DNA did not say so, but the Congress is suffering from a major inferiority complex and for its behaviour deserves condemnation.
The Asian Age (January 12) said that the Congress (represented by its spokesmen) seems to go into an overdrive and it is “time someone reined them in”. “The whole affair is disgraceful,” said the paper, adding: “The country’s oldest party can surely do better.” Importantly, it asked: “Since when has there been a ban in the Congress on making a critical appraisal of Nehru or his foreign policy? If so, Jawaharlal would be mortified, were he alive…. His was a life that naturally lends itself to penetrating analysis by scholars, statesmen and admirers… If Gandhi, Marx and Mao can be criticised, why not Nehru unless we choose to subscribe to unending hypocrisy and shaming sycophancy?” The paper pointed out that Tharoor is a Nehru scholar and that “ a great many things Nehru did and thought are no longer a part of the Congress’ make-up today”. It asked: “Will the party’s spokesmen arraign their leadership for this? Or do they prefer to emulate their counterparts in Beijing who say praise-be to Mao Zedong even as they run down in practice everything the great revolutionary leader stood for?”
The Asian Age didn’t say this, but who are Sonia Gandhi and Dr Manmohan Singh to defend the Congress when they were nowhere near the party from 1929 to 1949? How spineless can the Congress be? The Telegraph (January 12) pointed out that “dissent is going to be stifled within the Congress” and “there seems to be a tendency to make the Congress into a replica of a communist party with a ‘line’ on everything and on all subjects”. “If that were to happen,” said the paper, “the Congress would become a monolithic and a doctrinaire party”. Noting that “the Congress has always had an umbrella character and under that umbrella many have been called” and that the Congress has never been known to have a ‘line’ the paper said that “it cannot be anybody’s argument that Gandhi and Nehru—or for that matter any other major and charismatic Congress leader—are above criticism and historical re-evaluation”.
In conclusion, it said: “Every generation looks at past historical figures in its own terms. This is one of the unchanging principles of democratic discussion. The Congress, ever since its inception, has been part of such discussions and has always upheld debates in the best democratic tradition. The past must be open to interpretation; history cannot be frozen. Unfortunately, some elements within the Congress in a bid to display their loyalty are trying to overturn democratic traditions and turn the Congress into a party to which many are called and one voice is heard. It is necessary to nip those totalitarian tendencies in the bud. Otherwise the Congress will catch a tartar.”
This columnist who in his time has covered practically every AICC meeting from 1946 to 1955 and was present at the party meeting in 1942 when the Quit India resolution was passed, feels ashamed of the current Congress leadership to which they rose either by sheer accident or by planned design and not because of any sacrifice they made in the fight for freedom. Tharoor was defended in full by Arvind Adiga, author of the Booker Prize-winning book The White Tiger in another paper by claiming that Shashi Tharoor has written glowingly about Nehru’s contribution in creating a secular democracy and for giving India a role in international affairs that far exceeded military or economic strength. The truth is that today’s Congress leaders, whoever they are, do not deserve to be Congresswallahs. The Mahatma had realised it much before he was assassinated and had asked for its dissolution, which the party leadership declined to do. Perhaps the time has come now for the party to take some other name. It has no respect for past Congress tradition. Their leaders are all johnnies-come-lately attempting to cash in on the party’s great historic past. For them not democracy but power is all that matters. The Tharoor case has shown that in all nakedness. The best name for the party would be: Indian Sycophants Party—and that will reflect the truth.
What our editors should know is that some reporters do not attend meetings but get their information from someone who did; such reporters should be sharply pulled up. They are not doing their job, for which they are paid.
TWO issues stand out in the matter of the Shashi Tharoor case which need to be addressed. One is of being misquoted by the media. That is a serious enough charge, and needs to be immediately looked into. How can one possibly misquote a speaker if one is an attentive listener? In his presidential summing-up Tharoor was quoting Lord Bhiku Parekh who, apparently, was critical of both Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. The media ignored what Lord Bhiku Parekh said, which is bad enough. Then Shashi Tharoor was charged with criticising the Mahatma and Nehru when he was merely quoting Lord Parekh. That is worse. What our editors should know is that some reporters do not attend meetings but get their information from someone who did; such reporters should be sharply pulled up. They are not doing their job, for which they are paid. That is only one aspect of the problem.
A more serious one is the right of a politician to criticise his predecessors in the party. Mahatma Gandhi does not need anyone to defend him. In his time he was the unquestioned leader not just of the Congress, but of the country at large. In that sense, so was Nehru. Both made certain grievous mistakes. Nehru, for instance, should not have taken the Kashmir issue to the UN Security Council. In retrospect many have questioned Gandhi’s demand that the British should Quit India in 1942.
Happily, the media has risen to the occasion. The DNA (January 12) conceded that the media has erred in its reportage. But then it also pointed out: “The Congress Party is so steeped in its culture of worship, especially of the Nehru legacy, and to a lesser extent of Mahatma Gandhi, that it cannot countenance any criticism of its greats.” The paper pointed out that even when both Gandhi and Nehru were alive they had come in for regular criticism in the public domain, and even from within the party itself. Said DNA: “The (Congress) Party could just as well take a mature stance on what its members say about historical figures. It might help most Indian political parties if they encourage a little internal debate and discussion in the merits of democracy rather than take immediate umbrage. Party discipline need not be taken to Stalinists heights or depths as the case may be.” DNA did not say so, but the Congress is suffering from a major inferiority complex and for its behaviour deserves condemnation.
The Asian Age (January 12) said that the Congress (represented by its spokesmen) seems to go into an overdrive and it is “time someone reined them in”. “The whole affair is disgraceful,” said the paper, adding: “The country’s oldest party can surely do better.” Importantly, it asked: “Since when has there been a ban in the Congress on making a critical appraisal of Nehru or his foreign policy? If so, Jawaharlal would be mortified, were he alive…. His was a life that naturally lends itself to penetrating analysis by scholars, statesmen and admirers… If Gandhi, Marx and Mao can be criticised, why not Nehru unless we choose to subscribe to unending hypocrisy and shaming sycophancy?” The paper pointed out that Tharoor is a Nehru scholar and that “ a great many things Nehru did and thought are no longer a part of the Congress’ make-up today”. It asked: “Will the party’s spokesmen arraign their leadership for this? Or do they prefer to emulate their counterparts in Beijing who say praise-be to Mao Zedong even as they run down in practice everything the great revolutionary leader stood for?”
The Asian Age didn’t say this, but who are Sonia Gandhi and Dr Manmohan Singh to defend the Congress when they were nowhere near the party from 1929 to 1949? How spineless can the Congress be? The Telegraph (January 12) pointed out that “dissent is going to be stifled within the Congress” and “there seems to be a tendency to make the Congress into a replica of a communist party with a ‘line’ on everything and on all subjects”. “If that were to happen,” said the paper, “the Congress would become a monolithic and a doctrinaire party”. Noting that “the Congress has always had an umbrella character and under that umbrella many have been called” and that the Congress has never been known to have a ‘line’ the paper said that “it cannot be anybody’s argument that Gandhi and Nehru—or for that matter any other major and charismatic Congress leader—are above criticism and historical re-evaluation”.
In conclusion, it said: “Every generation looks at past historical figures in its own terms. This is one of the unchanging principles of democratic discussion. The Congress, ever since its inception, has been part of such discussions and has always upheld debates in the best democratic tradition. The past must be open to interpretation; history cannot be frozen. Unfortunately, some elements within the Congress in a bid to display their loyalty are trying to overturn democratic traditions and turn the Congress into a party to which many are called and one voice is heard. It is necessary to nip those totalitarian tendencies in the bud. Otherwise the Congress will catch a tartar.”
This columnist who in his time has covered practically every AICC meeting from 1946 to 1955 and was present at the party meeting in 1942 when the Quit India resolution was passed, feels ashamed of the current Congress leadership to which they rose either by sheer accident or by planned design and not because of any sacrifice they made in the fight for freedom. Tharoor was defended in full by Arvind Adiga, author of the Booker Prize-winning book The White Tiger in another paper by claiming that Shashi Tharoor has written glowingly about Nehru’s contribution in creating a secular democracy and for giving India a role in international affairs that far exceeded military or economic strength. The truth is that today’s Congress leaders, whoever they are, do not deserve to be Congresswallahs. The Mahatma had realised it much before he was assassinated and had asked for its dissolution, which the party leadership declined to do. Perhaps the time has come now for the party to take some other name. It has no respect for past Congress tradition. Their leaders are all johnnies-come-lately attempting to cash in on the party’s great historic past. For them not democracy but power is all that matters. The Tharoor case has shown that in all nakedness. The best name for the party would be: Indian Sycophants Party—and that will reflect the truth.
Oh God! All in the name of God
A Ph.D thesis on how to develop a church planting movement in India
www.rickross.com
HERE comes one more revealing document—a research conducted by a Missionary, interestingly to submit as his Phd thesis on Developing a Church Planting Movement in India!
These studies, especially from the Horses Mouth itself will have the right effect on true secular Hindus, who are unaware of these crookedness. There is a need to spread this among secular Hindus who fight tooth and nail to protect the undue rights granted to them by our pseudo secular Government.
One who goes through it can unearth their sinister designs and their dangerous game plan. More surprisingly how well they are implementing the same in our day-to-day life by fooling the majority.
In this thesis they highlight the importance to develop a new generation of Crypto Christians who can keep Hindu names, surname, can use Hindu sacred symbols, marks like tilak, bindi, can adorn hair partition with Kumkum to maintain their secrecy.
Christian missionaries on one hand preach high moral values, yet at the same time, they follow the lowest most despicable ones in order to convert people to their religion. Missionaries especially prey on the poorest, most rural folk under the guise of helping them out of poverty when in fact they have chosen to convert them because they are the most uneducated and therefore most likely to fall for their deception.
One common tactic employed by missionaries is to give a sick villager fake medicines which have no medicinal value and ask them to worship in the name of their faith for wellness. After several days, the missionary gives the villager an identical dose of the medicine, but this time it is the real medicine. Then the missionary will instruct the villager to now pray to Jesus. Soon after, due to the medicine and not due to Jesus, the villager will be cured. The uneducated and gullible villager, however, will attribute his cure to Jesus and convert to Christianity.
In villages in India, missionaries place a stone or metal idol of a Hindu deity in a bucket of water. The statue will sink in the bucket. Next the missionary brings a wax-coated idol of Jesus or Virgin Mary (though Christianity prohibits idols) and places that in the bucket. Due the wax-coat, the Christian idol will float. The missionary will then conclude that because the Christian idol floated, it is “higher” and, therefore, better than the Hindu one. The uneducated villager, not knowing anything about buoyancy or density, falls for the missionary’s ridiculous explanation and converts to Christianity.
Often missionaries will disguise themselves as religious leaders of the local religion and subtly attempt to convert the locals.The classic example was that of Robert de Nobili, a Jesuit from France, who came to India in the early 17th century. He adopted the saffron robe, started to live in a hut, squatted on the floor for conducting his discourses, became a vegetarian and gave up liquor, projected that he was a Brahmin saint from Rome and that the Bible was one of the lost Vedas (Hindu holy scriptures), and generally tried to pass himself as another Hindu sanyasi.
www.rickross.com
HERE comes one more revealing document—a research conducted by a Missionary, interestingly to submit as his Phd thesis on Developing a Church Planting Movement in India!
These studies, especially from the Horses Mouth itself will have the right effect on true secular Hindus, who are unaware of these crookedness. There is a need to spread this among secular Hindus who fight tooth and nail to protect the undue rights granted to them by our pseudo secular Government.
One who goes through it can unearth their sinister designs and their dangerous game plan. More surprisingly how well they are implementing the same in our day-to-day life by fooling the majority.
In this thesis they highlight the importance to develop a new generation of Crypto Christians who can keep Hindu names, surname, can use Hindu sacred symbols, marks like tilak, bindi, can adorn hair partition with Kumkum to maintain their secrecy.
Christian missionaries on one hand preach high moral values, yet at the same time, they follow the lowest most despicable ones in order to convert people to their religion. Missionaries especially prey on the poorest, most rural folk under the guise of helping them out of poverty when in fact they have chosen to convert them because they are the most uneducated and therefore most likely to fall for their deception.
One common tactic employed by missionaries is to give a sick villager fake medicines which have no medicinal value and ask them to worship in the name of their faith for wellness. After several days, the missionary gives the villager an identical dose of the medicine, but this time it is the real medicine. Then the missionary will instruct the villager to now pray to Jesus. Soon after, due to the medicine and not due to Jesus, the villager will be cured. The uneducated and gullible villager, however, will attribute his cure to Jesus and convert to Christianity.
In villages in India, missionaries place a stone or metal idol of a Hindu deity in a bucket of water. The statue will sink in the bucket. Next the missionary brings a wax-coated idol of Jesus or Virgin Mary (though Christianity prohibits idols) and places that in the bucket. Due the wax-coat, the Christian idol will float. The missionary will then conclude that because the Christian idol floated, it is “higher” and, therefore, better than the Hindu one. The uneducated villager, not knowing anything about buoyancy or density, falls for the missionary’s ridiculous explanation and converts to Christianity.
Often missionaries will disguise themselves as religious leaders of the local religion and subtly attempt to convert the locals.The classic example was that of Robert de Nobili, a Jesuit from France, who came to India in the early 17th century. He adopted the saffron robe, started to live in a hut, squatted on the floor for conducting his discourses, became a vegetarian and gave up liquor, projected that he was a Brahmin saint from Rome and that the Bible was one of the lost Vedas (Hindu holy scriptures), and generally tried to pass himself as another Hindu sanyasi.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)